DATAMAGNET VS DROPCONTACT
Dropcontact Finds the Email. Datamagnet Reads the Profile.
Dropcontact computes and tests verified B2B email addresses, then tidies the record in your CRM. Datamagnet returns the live profile behind a URL — work history, company, posts, engagement and job-change signals — as JSON your code can use. Different outputs, and frequently used together.
- Dropcontact Starter, 500 credits
- €29/moDropcontact Starter, 500 credits
- Datamagnet Starter, 1,000 credits
- $39/moDatamagnet Starter, 1,000 credits
- Datamagnet credits, no card required
- 10 freeDatamagnet credits, no card required
Datamagnet vs Dropcontact: the short answer
Dropcontact and Datamagnet solve different halves of the same problem, so most teams pick by output. Dropcontact is a GDPR-first email finder: give it a name and a company, or a LinkedIn URL, and it computes and tests a verified B2B email, then cleans and deduplicates the record inside HubSpot, Pipedrive, Salesforce, a spreadsheet or its API. Datamagnet returns no email addresses at all. It returns the live profile behind a URL, plus posts, engagement, ICP search and job-change signals. Choose Dropcontact for deliverable contact details in a CRM; choose Datamagnet when your code needs profile and activity data.
Our verdict
Dropcontact is the better product for the job it does, and Datamagnet does not do that job. If you need a verified, deliverable B2B email address — especially starting from a name and a company, especially with a European DPO reading the contract — Dropcontact is a clean answer, and its native CRM apps mean you may never write a line of code. What it will not give you is depth. It returns a LinkedIn URL rather than what is on the profile behind it, and it has no prospecting, no post or engagement data, and no way to watch a person over time. Datamagnet fits when the question is who this person is and what they are doing, and when the caller is code.
Which one should you pick?
Straight guidance, including the cases where we're the wrong answer.
Choose Datamagnet if
- You need what is on the profile — full work history, education, tenure, current role — not only a cleaned job title
- Your input is a LinkedIn URL or a search query, and the consumer of the data is your product, pipeline or agent
- You want post content, commenters, reactors and reposters as structured data
- You need net-new prospects: ICP search, the people search database, or a Sales Navigator search URL
- You want job-change and engagement signals delivered by webhook to any system, not alerts confined to a CRM
- You want one request and one JSON response rather than submitting a batch and polling for it
Choose Dropcontact if
- You need email addresses. Datamagnet does not return them at any price, and Dropcontact exists to find them
- You need email validation and catch-all verification before you send — Datamagnet has no equivalent
- Enrichment has to land on HubSpot, Pipedrive or Salesforce records with no engineering work
- GDPR posture is a procurement gate and your DPO wants a vendor that holds no contact database and processes in the EU
- Your starting point is a name and a company name, not a LinkedIn URL
- Non-technical users need to drag a CSV in or work from a Google Sheet
- You need duplicate detection and merge across an existing CRM database
Datamagnet vs Dropcontact, feature by feature
What each tool actually returns, how fresh it is, and what it costs to run.
Data & API coverage
| Feature | Datamagnet | Dropcontact |
|---|---|---|
| Verified B2B email addresses | No | Yes |
| Email validation & catch-all verification | No | Yes |
| Phone / mobile numbers | No | CRM Integration Suite |
| Enrich from a LinkedIn URL | Yes | Growth plan |
| Full profile: work history, education, tenure | Yes | No |
| Company profile & Crunchbase funding history | Yes | Firmographics only |
| Post content, comments, reactions, reposts | Yes | No |
| ICP search & people search database | Yes | No |
| Sales Navigator URL search | Yes | No |
| Job-change detection | 6 signal types, webhook | Company change detection |
| API shape | One call, JSON back | Async batch, poll request_id |
| CSV / XLS file enrichment & Google Sheets add-on | No | Yes |
| Native HubSpot, Pipedrive & Salesforce apps | No | Yes |
| Duplicate detection & merge | No | Yes |
| French SIREN / SIRET / NAF / VAT data | No | Yes |
Dropcontact capabilities are summarized from their public documentation and pricing pages, last checked July 2026. Products change — verify against their current offering before you buy.
Both compute in real time. The difference is what they compute.
The usual live-versus-database argument does not apply on this page. Dropcontact holds no contact database either — it generates candidate addresses from a name and a domain and tests them on its own servers when you ask. So both products answer at request time. What separates them is the answer. Dropcontact returns an email address and a tidy contact row. Datamagnet returns the profile itself: full work history, education, current role and tenure, the company record behind it, and the posts and engagement that person has generated. If your gap is deliverability, Dropcontact closes it. If your gap is context, it does not.
- Input — Dropcontact accepts name + company, full name + company, a LinkedIn URL, or an email; Datamagnet accepts a LinkedIn URL or a search
- Output — Dropcontact returns a verified email plus firmographics; Datamagnet returns the profile, the company, the posts and the people engaging with them
- Shape — Dropcontact takes up to 250 contacts per request and hands back a request_id to poll; Datamagnet answers one call at a time
Pricing, side by side
What you pay Dropcontact versus what you pay us, for the same work.
Dropcontact
Euro-priced monthly subscriptions on the Files & API plan, sized by a credit slider from 500 to 150,000 credits a month. A credit is spent when a verified email is returned or an email is submitted for verification, and refunded when no email is found. CRM enrichment is a separate subscription — Files & API credits cannot be used inside a CRM.
- Free trialOn signup
- 50 credits
- Starter500 credits · €79/mo at 4,000 credits
- from €29/mo
- Growth500 credits · adds LinkedIn URL enrichment
- from €35/mo
- Growth, 4,000 creditsLinkedIn + company data enrichment
- €120/mo
- EnterpriseFrom 200,000 credits/month
- Custom
Datamagnet
Credits, not seats. Charged only on successful requests, and 10 free credits to test before you pay anything.
- FreeOn signup, no card
- 10 credits
- Starter1,000 credits/mo
- $39/mo
- Pro10,000 credits/mo
- $99/mo
- Scale25,000 credits/mo · webhooks + bulk export
- $199/mo
- Pay-as-you-go200 credits $10 → 100,000 credits $2,000
- from $0.02/credit
Dropcontact prices in euros and bills annual plans 20% below monthly. LinkedIn URL enrichment — the closest overlap with Datamagnet — sits on the Growth plan, from €35/month. Competitor pricing is taken from their public pricing page and was last checked July 2026; list prices change and negotiated rates differ. See Datamagnet pricing for our current plans.
Where each tool genuinely wins
No tool wins everywhere. Here's the honest split.
Where Dropcontact wins
- Verified B2B email addresses, which Datamagnet does not return at all — for most Dropcontact buyers that is the entire purchase
- Native email validation and catch-all verification, so you know what is safe to send before you send it
- A GDPR posture that survives procurement: no contact database, EU-based processing, and a public commitment that no personal data is stored or resold
- Native apps for HubSpot, Pipedrive and Salesforce that enrich, deduplicate and merge records in place with no engineering work
- Works from a name and a company name — no LinkedIn URL required, which matters when your list came from a form or a conference
- Drag-and-drop CSV and XLS enrichment plus a Google Sheets add-on for people who do not write code
- French entity data — SIREN, SIRET, NAF codes and VAT numbers — at a depth very few vendors match
- Mobile numbers in its CRM Integration Suite, sourced from email-signature extraction; Datamagnet returns no phone numbers
Where Datamagnet wins
- The full professional profile — work history, education, tenure and current role — not just a cleaned job title
- Company profiles from a LinkedIn URL, with company insights and Crunchbase-sourced funding history
- Post content plus commenters, reactors and reposters as structured data
- Net-new prospecting: ICP search, the people search database, and Sales Navigator URL search
- Six signal types — job change, new post, keyword, industry, company and person engagement — delivered by HMAC-signed webhook
- One request, one JSON response, instead of submitting a batch and polling a request_id
- Per-endpoint credit costs in dollars, charged only on successful requests, with 10 free credits to test
- No seats, and no separate subscription for each surface you use it on
Datamagnet vs Dropcontact: FAQ
Sources
Every competitor claim on this page traces back to one of these.
- 1.Dropcontact — Pricing (Starter and Growth credit tiers, free trial, Enterprise threshold) — checked July 2026
- 2.Dropcontact — API documentation (enrich endpoint, input keys, response fields, batch limits) — checked July 2026
- 3.Dropcontact Knowledge Base — How the Files & API subscription and credits work — checked July 2026
- 4.Dropcontact — Product overview (GDPR claim, CRM integrations, data returned) — checked July 2026
Try Datamagnet against Dropcontact on your own data
10 free credits, no credit card. Run the same lookups through both and compare the JSON yourself.
- Live data at request time
- Charged only on success
- No seats, no annual contract
Interactive Demo
~15 minutes
Get your API key
1 minEnrich a test record
2 minWire into your stack
Same day